Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nurcha Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 23:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nurcha Records[edit]

Non-notable record label—not a single notable artist; fails WP:CORP. Also unreferenced—fails WP:V. Precious Roy (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A7, company with no notability asserted, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:25, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, no assertion of notability. Also fails WP:MUSIC and WP:CORP Mr Senseless (talk) 22:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Speedy deletion has already been declined, that's why it's here in AfD. Precious Roy (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability. Speedy if possible. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:40, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Longhair\^talk 22:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, very minor fringe record label. If one of their artists makes it big, should not be much trouble to recreate article. Lankiveil (talk) 00:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Speedy Delete No notability. --Shark face 217 22:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

are all the people deadshit losers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.69.60 (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]