Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nunawading to Chelsea (888/889: SMARTBUS)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spebi 06:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nunawading to Chelsea (888/889: SMARTBUS)[edit]

Is a bus route notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia? Perhaps, but not this one. The article provides no independent reliable sources asserting notability. Other wikipedia articles are not reliable sources and the Victorian government sources are not independent. Mattinbgn\^talk 11:33, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 11:34, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a directory of busroutes or timetables. Nothing else to write about this subject - Peripitus (Talk) 20:54, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There's a long-standing consensus that bus routes aren't notable. --Nick Dowling (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An article on SmartBus the concept ~~could be useful to Wikipedia~~ already exists - oops but a particular route - no. Orderinchaos 17:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, individual routes are not notable by themselves. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 01:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - there's not much that can be written about the route except for where it goes or its timetable (that information belongs on the official Metlink site). The little bit of history (if you could call it that) of the bus route could be incorporated into the SmartBus article. invincible (talk) 14:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.