Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number 53 (webcomic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango 123 (e) 14:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number 53 (webcomic)[edit]

The first of 4 webcomics I bring to you today is Number 53, found here. If you have a look at Talk:Number 53 (webcomic), you'll see the article author noting why he believes the article to be notable, being that it is linked from The Webcomic List, however, I disagree. Being that the Webcomic list is merely a webcomic link site which hosts entries for thousands of webcomics. This is not a notable website, having been established just over 3 months ago, a look on Google for "number 53" webcomic only finds 30 links, all of them trivial. - Hahnch e n 00:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Royboy crashfan 00:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as author's name is "Creamer," which fails WP:LOL_CREAMER. Or as non-notable. Aplomado - U T C 00:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 00:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC) [reply]
Delete per nom --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another nn webcomic.ßlηguγɛη | Have your say!!! 01:47, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete. what's with all the webcomics? delete as per nom.--Strothra 02:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Pureblade | ^Θ 03:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and I have no idea what you're talking about Aplomado. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sheehan (Talk) 04:28, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing more than cruft. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. It doesn't even have its own domain. --David.Mestel 07:20, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 08:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Metamagician3000 09:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Marketleap.com results (limited presence; realize that isn't the standard, also due to other tests), and per nom. MikeBriggs 17:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom. Computerjoe 's talk 18:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If it's so great why does he have to host it on Blogspot?
Transwiki to Comixpedia, then Delete. -Colin Kimbrell 19:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Jersey Devil 02:21, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.