Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nukkad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 14:54, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nukkad[edit]

Non-notable mailing list Dr Debug (Talk) 03:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. But it should be revised to encompass the broader definition of Nukkad as stated in the first sentence of the article.--Nsevs 03:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Another poorly written article. Royboycrashfan 04:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the only non-spam sentence in this article is a dictionary definition. —Cleared as filed. 04:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - advertising for mailing list. —ERcheck @ 06:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Advertising. *drew 06:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per "Cleared as filed" Ruby 06:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, ad. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 13:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless revised as suggested by Nsevs. utcursch | talk 08:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment has the potential to be a good disambiguation page - refering to (a) the generic definition; (b) a popular television serial by the same name in the late 1980' on India's only national TV channel at that time (Doordarshan) and (c) the mailing list referred to in the article (provided its notability is established). However, I am not entirely sure if it makes sense to create a disambiguation page without having articles for any of the proposed entries. Would like to hear from other editors. Or another possibility is to convert the article to a text about the TV serial (only problem is that due to FUTON bias, probly very little would be available on the net about the seial (due to the fact that it is late 1980's) and hence may be deemed non-notabe). --Gurubrahma 15:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.