Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nubreed 7
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 07:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Nubreed 7[edit]
- Nubreed 7 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to have been missed in the bundled nom for the other Nubreed albums: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nubreed 001. Same rationale applies: not particularly notable, fails WP:NALBUM. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nubreed 001. Lourdes 01:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:07, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per the above. I agree that it is not particularly notable and must have been forgotten/missed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nubreed 001. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: personally I love the NuBreed albums, but I can't justify their inclusion on Wikipedia, and the same goes for most mix albums, to be honest. This was almost certainly reviewed in the likes of Mixmag and DJ Mag, but there's very little else you could say about this type of album that could form the basis of a decent article. Richard3120 (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm no expert on the topic but I wonder if there's enough critical content in those reviews to support an article on the series as a whole? Obviously if they're just like "great album good job" then no, but if they talk about previous NuBreed albums and compare them, that actually might pass GNG and be worth documenting in a standalone. YMMV if you actually want to do that but it's a thought. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- @PMC: I agree that where you have a series of albums like this, there's more chance of a decent stand-alone article if you focus on the series as a whole rather than the individual albums. The NuBreed series was a spin-off from the successful Global Underground series, designed to highlight up-and-coming DJs (hence the series title) rather than the established DJ names who mixed the GU albums. So in this case it would make more sense to include the albums within the Global Underground article, and indeed that is where they are mentioned: Global Underground#Nubreed. Richard3120 (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm no expert on the topic but I wonder if there's enough critical content in those reviews to support an article on the series as a whole? Obviously if they're just like "great album good job" then no, but if they talk about previous NuBreed albums and compare them, that actually might pass GNG and be worth documenting in a standalone. YMMV if you actually want to do that but it's a thought. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.