Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ns8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:37, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ns8[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NCORP, WP:GNG, and WP:PROMO. I think the only argument to be made is that their affiliation with MACH37 makes them notable, but that might be crossing over into WP:INHERIT. The company was founded in 2016, simply WP:TOOSOON. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nomination for WP:NCORP, WP:GNG, and possibly WP:TOOSOON, but not WP:PROMO. Nothing about this article seems promotional in nature. Nothing about this article is any different from other well established articles about companies. {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam on an unremarkable private company. Content belongs on the company web site, not here. Such as this:

The primary goal of this product is to counter the rising levels of Internet marketing and retail fraud which in 2015, cost advertisers $5 Billion out of the total $14.6 Billion spent on online advertising.

Strictly "marketing brochure" content. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a clear motivation of PR misuse considering the information is PR backed by their own republished PR, that's clear enough for any deletion. SwisterTwister talk 19:00, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.