Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noxilo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 08:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noxilo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Noxilo is a NN conlang has no relevant Ghits outside of what I assume is the creator's website and a post on a conlanging forum. It's been around for six years without even an attempt to establish notability. Hermione is a dude (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I vaguely recall having heard somewhere that Noxilo is or was quite a hit in Japan, but you're right, Google doesn't turn up anything that points at notability, whether you search for "Noxilo" or for "ノシロ語", and neither does the article itself. It mentions a book, but no title and no other references. All I've found is the author's website and a few blog posts. —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 18:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment. This conlang has been referred in a comparatively authoritive journal "Monthly Language"(Nov. 2006)by Taishukan shoten(「人工言語ミニ事典ノシロ語（水田扇太郎）」『月刊言語』2006年11月号（特集人工言語の世界 -- ことばを創るとはどういうことか）所収、大修館書店)--山田拙者 (talk) 12:39, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That's good, but one single reference is still not enough. One or two more, and I'd be inclined to change my vote. —IJzeren Jan _Uszkiełtu? 20:39, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a different class. Hermione is a dude (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication of meeting WP:GNG. Would need multiple references independent of the creator. Aɴɢʀ (talk) 12:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.