Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music 23 (N.Z. series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all. I don't see evidence of re-creation and the other ones seem to have been deleted without problems but if any are recreated, I'll protect redirects. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now That's What I Call Music 23 (N.Z. series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable compilation albums. Some of these charted in this very small market, but I'm not seeing any in-depth of the ones that did. The missing numbers from the sequence have been deleted at AfD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music 14 (N.Z. series), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music 18 (N.Z. series), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music 19 (N.Z. series), etc. Redirect to Now_That's_What_I_Call_Music!_discography#New_Zealand a possibility. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Searching for news references (see here) comes back with nothing. But searching for web references with Wikipedia articles filtered out (see here) reveals some sources, but mostly about the series in general. Nothing that would establish the need for every single album to have each have their own Wikipedia article. If someone asserts a good argument against deletion, merge all of this into one article about the series. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All the aforementioned entries exist for the sole purpose for the marketing of products. As such I believe these entries represent a misuse of Wikipedia. ^[1] --Lfrankblam 18:43, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

^ http://www.inc.com/managing/articles/201001/wikipedia.html

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete As covered above and previous nominations of this sort. These are non-notable albums failing SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:10, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Given the on-going history of IP-based recreation (see related article, etc), could the closing admin please consider salting (or protecting redirects, if that's the way it goes)? Stuartyeates (talk) 06:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per nom and consensus/rationale in previous AfDs of similar titles. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttp://www.inc.com/managing/articles/201001/wikipedia.html

[1]