Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novak Druce + Quigg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 January 18.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Novak Druce + Quigg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely a non-notable law firm under our inclusion policy at WP:CORP Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 12:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. <( User:Couch on his Head and Smiling (talk) )> 06:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - New information was added giving relevancy. User:Timetraveller1066 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timetraveler1066 (talk • contribs) 19:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC) — Timetraveler1066 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete Spam. None of the references are to Independent Reliable Sources. --MelanieN (talk) 21:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.