Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NovaPDF (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NovaPDF[edit]

NovaPDF (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. Non-notable software. SL93 (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I just noticed the prior discussion that ended in deletion. I tagged the article for speedy deletion. SL93 (talk) 18:59, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing has happened yet with the speedy deletion tag. That is strange. SL93 (talk) 23:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Declined by admin due to being different from deleted version. SL93 (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Nom says it all. Not notable, therefore is unsuitable for encyclopedia inclusion, delete. Justarandomamerican (talk) If you're here to build a encyclopedia, have a nice day doing so! 19:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I found a review that looks like an ad, and a French article that has a short paragraph about it but that lacks much of anything that would be useful in the article. Sources in the article are primary or very poor. Hobit (talk) 13:04, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The sources in the article do not establish notability (and the supposed "review" on CNET appears to be a page focused on downloading the software rather than some news piece reviewing it). I can't find anything substantial in a search, nor can I see any reasonable place to redirect this article. — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.