Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NovaMin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:46, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

NovaMin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant advertisement article, promotes named brand all over the place without giving actual scientific evidence or effectiveness for its claims. --RuleTheWiki (talk) 08:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: [As requested i have created a separate AfD for the other page which is now available. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Recaldent.]

Delete Sources do not sufficiently establish notability. 4 & 5 are in-house reports, 1,2 and 6 are incidental mentions or beside the point entirely. Ref 3 seems legit but doesn't make this notable on its own. Quick search does not turn up anything better.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete reads like an ad and not notable. DeVerm (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment suggest nom creates AfD for other pages mentioned (Recaldent) DeVerm (talk) 22:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete NovaMin, not sure for Recaldent. Like User:DeVerm, I think the bundling was inappropriate (similar topic, but different analysis).

For NovaMin, I found this but I am not sure ceramics.org is a reliable source. Since there are no secondary sources other than ceramics.org in my search, that is still not enough in any case. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it's only a brand name, not anything else to suggest automatic independent notability and there's also nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 21:28, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.