Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notion (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notion (magazine)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No verifiable sources can be found to substantiate notability. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as prodder. No third-party sources used in the article. Google returns nothing substantial either. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 05:30, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of any kind of notability outside a small coterie of fans. No coverage in the music or fashion press, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:53, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

NOBODY UNDERSTANDS HOW TO USE WIKIPEDIA... FACT. AND THIS IS A REAL, NATIONAL, LONG-RUNNING MAGAZINE SO NO REASON TO DELETE IT'S PAGE YOU MORONS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.175.8.214 (talk) 00:35, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]