Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nothing (technology company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AfD does not really need to be relisted. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing (technology company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

attempted twice to redirect to founder, as the company itself isn't independently notable. no oposition to redirect. CUPIDICAE💕 15:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, we've recently learned some new things with the company but yes, the company and the page itself will grow overtime. In fact, one of their new phones just got announced today so this could potentially help bring in some new information for the company, which can become notable. While I'm still gathering new information that will best work with it, for now, it's best that this article should grow. 20chances (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I second this. The company is becoming more noteworthy with their upcoming releases.

The lack of information surrounding the company is a symptom of their unique marketing methodology. Once they have finally released a product, it would not be appropriate that information surrounding this would be bundled into the founder's Wikipedia page. 81.146.37.146 (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed on that point. Though, I think for the section on Nothing on the founder's page (Carl Pei), I suggest it would be kept but it should be brief, for now. It doesn't have to have too much info on the company unless anything goes up with Pei internally like ownership changes or changes in position. 20chances (talk) 01:46, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, company is new but is backed by notable individuals and more information about its products is quickly coming out Chrisanthusjohn (talk) 20:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the subject has coverage and notability sufficient for encyclopedic inclusion, especially after recent updates by User:20chances to improve the article. - Indefensible (talk) 22:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG due to a sufficient amount of secondary sources that have been deemed reliable, such as The Verge, and significant coverage elsewhere. Bonoahx (talk) 12:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:GNG, has good sources Rlink2 (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.