Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not Yielding to Ungodly Demo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 02:51, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Yielding to Ungodly Demo[edit]

Not Yielding to Ungodly Demo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable demo. References are only track listings. The Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music does not list the demo in its Living Sacrifice entry (pp. 536-7). Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • You do realize that Living Sacrifice is far from "Contemporary Christian" music? And this band has been around longer than Third Day, who is about as pop as it gets. Metalworker14 (Yo) 10:20, 15 April, 2015 (UTC)
    • I do realize both are true, but it's not clear how that matters. You realize that that book lists everyone from Evie to Living Sacrifice. If you're not familiar with the work, look into it. It's a very exhaustive collection of information until 2001. What matters is that the demo is discussed, at length, in any reliable sources. The only reason I mention that work is that it lists all of their albums (up to the time of publication) and it's not listed, so it's not even important enough to list there. I couldn't find any sources that discuss it. And it's clear that the two references on the article are only track listings, which do not qualify a significant coverage. Finally, I should have redirected it, but, in the past, you have objected to that, opposed speedy deletions and PRODs so I decided to take the article to AfD. The article never should have been created. Period. You still don't understand that not every work by every musician that has an article on Wikipedia deserves an article. Until you understand that, you're going to waste my time and that of other editors. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 15:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.