Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Not One More!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was {{deletedpage}}. Mailer Diablo 21:43, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not One More![edit]

Created by a member of the group (obviously) and not stated in neutral terms, but mainly there is no evidence that the neutrality of this article can be properly verified from reliable sources (i.e. it is not notable). Deleted twice via WP:PROD as failing to establish notability, deletion is contested this time round so bringing to AfD. I have to say that an anti-Iraq-war group formed in 2005 is running a little behind the curve. Just zis Guy you know? 10:22, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 10:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and protect per nom. --Arnzy (Talk) 10:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV advert for a nn-group. Also, article recreated following prior deletion. Kcordina ^Talk 11:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Repost of deleted nn company. J.J.Sagnella 13:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as creation of deleted material. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --RobertG ♬ talk 14:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Does not qualify under CSD as recreation of previously deleted article, as both previous deletions were under {{prod}}. In fact my reading of that policy is that it should have been brought here instead of being {{prod}}ded a second time. --RobertG ♬ talk 14:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and protect Per above editora Aeon 18:44, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete blatantly political POV. Pat Payne 15:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--I've actually put a few of their flyers up (they were free in the local peace action center) but I don't think they are at all notable. The Ungovernable Force 06:10, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.