Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ♪ Keep ♪. El_C 12:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪[edit]

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, WP:OR, WP:SPAM, WP:NCVG. Ruiewql 13:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible single-purpose account: Ruiewql has made no edits to Wikipedia other than the three required to nominate this article for deletion. — Haeleth Talk 21:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unsourced and unverifiable crystal balling. MER-C 13:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Qvng 13:40, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: Are you people even actually looking at the article? The game has both an official website and has been the cover story for a magazine, I haven't speculated about this game at all and made no original research. Crystal balling refers to making articles on games without official annoucements that they will be released, such as a Metroid Prime 5. Metroid Prime 3 however, is annouced and in development as is Nostradamus ni Kiite Miro♪. Furthermore, it is being produced by one of the most respectable publishers of visual novels, and is a notable game in Japan (as evident of it having an article on the Japanese Wikipedia). And I don't see how it falls under WP:SPAM at all.--SeizureDog 13:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, since no valid reason has been given why this should be deleted. As SeizureDog points out, despite the claims of the nominator and the first voter it does not in fact fail WP:V or WP:NOR (it is acceptable to use a primary source, such as a game website, for basic factual plot and character information); it does not fail WP:SPAM (since it is not advertising), and nor does it fail WP:CRYSTAL (since it contains no information that has not been publicly announced). It would also appear to meet the standards tentatively proposed by WP:NCVG (having apparently been featured prominently in the relevant sector of the gaming press). In short, a perfectly reasonable stub. — Haeleth Talk 21:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as crystal balling.--Oneonex 22:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Read crystal balling: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. If preparation for the event isn't already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented." The development of this notable (in Japan, but still notable; must avoid being bias for this reason alone) game is clearly in progress.--SeizureDog 22:49, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that this is one of only two edits by Oneonex; the other was also a "delete" vote. — Haeleth Talk 21:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sourced and in development +Hexagon1 ^(t) 00:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We're getting to the point were noms are throwing up every WP guildline ever written. Pretty soon no article would be suitable for inclusion. Has been announced and by major game developer. --Oakshade 22:49, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.