Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nosratallah Khakian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jreferee (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can submit an edit request, discuss changes on the talk page, request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

Nosratallah Khakian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, weak references that do little to establish notability. Since the Farsi wikipedia page was deemed non-notable (AFD page is here) we're left with no compelling reason to keep a page up on English wiki. Hairhorn (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've done what I could to improve this article. The original was a mess, being translated from Persian by a new user who did not understand the various templates. There are still problems with the translation I was not able to clear up, such as the subjects exact name. I don't think I'll miss it if/when it goes.--Auric 22:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- These are tricky to remove from Persian Wikipedia article Mr. N. dirt and Iran are enemies. These are the spies who want to name who does not work and actions and he did not look like there is not any. So the first article in the Persian Wikipedia Najvanrdanh N. earthy and unlike real policy removed the wiki now to remove this article are in English. If this is not the case because they involved the English Wikipedia! Please consider this matter will be considered.Paper [N. dirt]] is a notable and reliable sources but unfortunately some Persian Wikipedia administrators are instructed not to allow anyone who does not think it will stay in Clearwater. That is why they are involved in the English Wikipedia. It is hoped that this material will influence the final decision.Thanks Kamran1370 (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2012 (UTC) — Kamran1370 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Huh? "dirt" appears to be a machine translation of "Khakian", no idea what is meant by "Clearwater". The talk of "spies" is bizarre at best, are all the "delete" votes in the AFD from spies? Hairhorn (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

بماند- سلام جناب آقای هیرهورن! استناد به نظر خواهی ویکی پدیای فارسی اصلاً منطقی نیست. من که گفتم آن ها برخلاف معیارهای ویکی پدیا و مغرضانه مقاله ی نصرت اله خاکیان را حذف کردند و به این هم قانع نشده به سراغ مقاله ی انگلیسی آمده اند تا آن را هم حذف کنند.Kamran1370 (talk) 17:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rough translation: Stay - Dear Mr. Hyrhvrn! Persian Wikipedia is not logical at all, according to the poll. They told me that unlike Wikipedia standards and biased article by N. remove dirt and failed to convince the English papers have come to know so they can remove it.--Auric 14:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 22:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I can't find anything in the article that meets Creative or Prof guidelines, and without other evidence I give wide latitude to the delete result of the Farsi AfD vote. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - this article in its sources and its owner is known.Kamran1370 (talk) 14:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - you can not claim the Persian Wikipedia. They are enemies and Preparing the soil with N..2.185.208.62 (talk) 14:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC) — 2.185.208.62 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Struck though duplicate vote; no reason to think the IP vote isn't also a duplicate, particularly since they are one of the participants in the outrageous amount of vandalism on this page. Hairhorn (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ - it is quite obvious that this person is well-known and reputable sources. We should not blindly imitate the Persian Wikipedia articles to delete. Thanks.Bekham17 (talk) 20:17, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

struck obvious sock vote, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kamran1370. Hairhorn (talk) 22:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per apparent fail of WP:GNG, WP:CREATIVE - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. WP:PROF does not apply, as the subject is a high school teacher. I note that this is a repost - my previous comment was removed by an IP address, so closer beware. Ray^Talk 20:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is deemed non-notable in the Farsi language and there is next to no English refs. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 04:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it fails WP:GNG. Mr T ^(Talk?) ^{(New thread?)} 21:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.