Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwegian Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian Magazine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to suggest that this is a notable magazine. Only source provided doesn’t support the 4 million a month claim. The source is also more about the company that produces the magazine rather than the magazine itself. only (talk) 03:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Trillfendi (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. YtoSu (talk) 00:48, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why? YSSYguy (talk) 06:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. - ZLEA _Talk\^Contribs 18:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, as the airline had 33.2mill passengers in 2017 a readership of 48mill/year appears exaggerated. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:18, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; the only source is not about the magazine, but about how some people went to Svalbard to get material for a story that was printed in the magazine. As User:only says above, it's about the company that produces the magazine - a puff piece about how clever they all were. YSSYguy (talk) 06:36, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacks coverage in independent sources. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.