Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northumbria Helicopters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cabayi (talk) 19:24, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Northumbria Helicopters[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references, more promotional than encyclopedic, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG - just undeleted from previous PROD with no improvements. KylieTastic (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. KylieTastic (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KylieTastic (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I couldn't find any significant coverage: the fact that two of the major editors are SPAs, combined with the heavily promotional tone, suggests a Conflict of Interests. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:07, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.