Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northland Village Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northland Village Mall[edit]

Contested PROD, small non-notable mall, no significant media or any other coverage. I see nothing notable about this mall Kyle1278 21:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 00:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is a regional mall per ISCA standards (see Shopping Mall) with 510,000 square feet of Gross leasable area. Per a list of past AFD results for malls at the essay Wikipedia talk:Notability (shopping centers)#AFD results in table form for easy viewing we have deleted many article about malls of this size. Malls below the "superregiinal size (800,000 square feet) have generally needed something more than mere existence to get kept in AFD. Edison (talk) 01:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
keep they are the winner of a recipient of a 1998 MAXI Award, the highest award given in the industry that I know of. Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 04:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficiently notable to warrant inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question is the "MAXI Award" truly a notable distinction? If so then I guess keep it. The article really needs work either way. JBsupreme (talk) 08:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If the ISCA is notable enough to determine how we classify malls, I'd say their awards are notable enough to convey notability.--Crossmr (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Award appears notable.--Crossmr (talk) 09:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.