Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Rovers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 01:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Rovers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Case of WP:TOOSOON. Club is brand new after a merger between two clubs and doesn't meet the old WP:FOOTYN guidelines for clubs yet, doesn't meet WP:NSPORTS or WP:GNG. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 17:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 17:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:NFOOTY. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - likely to be notable in the future, but WP:CRYSTAL applies, and there's no evidence of notability currently. Giant Snowman 20:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Smerge into Glenfield Rovers, the more prominent of the the source teams. Given the history of the clubs involved, it may become notable later, but it's currently too soon to know that. Grutness...wha? 00:22, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would of just moved the article into draft space! Considering the age of the club, more sources would come out locally to that location there, seems rash running this to AfD without giving the creator a chance. Govvy (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup, drafting would work for me too. Grutness...wha? 21:42, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:FOOTYN. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm happy if original user or someone else wants the article changed to draft but otherwise it's just a case that of too early. The club will be notable in the future I'm sure, just not now! NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 02:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find significant coverage Nexus000 (talk) 23:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.