Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Lights (1997 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator

Northern Lights (1997 film)[edit]

Northern Lights (1997 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTFILM Northern Lights is not notable enough for its own article. Despite that it was commercially distributed, there are no citations to any news articles, and no professionally critical reviews of it that I could find. The only citation simply serves to prove of its existence, and existence alone is not enough for notability. Jcmcc450 (talk) 19:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator I was far too hasty in my AfD. I won't be pushing them when i'm tired anymore. Jcmcc450 (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Clearly meets WP:GNG. A film starring Diane Keaton and produced by Disney Studios meets the guidelines for notability. J I would suggest that you read WP:BEFORE as you proceed with future AFDs. A {{Refimprove|date=XXXX}} tag rather than an AFD is what this article needs. MarnetteD|Talk 00:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I missed that there is a variation of the refimprove tag. Yes the article could use expansion - there a hundreds of thousands of articles that is true of. MarnetteD|Talk 00:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.