Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North bar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 19:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
North bar[edit]
A not particularly notable bar, other than getting a mention in The Observer. Joyous | Talk 01:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Richardcavell 02:28, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sorry, we can't include every bar that happens to win a newspaper award, even if it is a national weekly paper. Grandmasterka 03:43, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "I think... my opinion only..." WP:NPOV violation for language and where are the winners of the award from previous years? If they have not been otherwise noted as drinking establishments or have since ceased trading then this could be a delete vote. The photographs add nothing to the article, as they could have been taken anywhere. (aeropagitica) (talk) 06:08, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 07:39, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Vanity, nn, etc... Ydam 11:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. DarthVader 12:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Rob 12:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable bar. JIP | Talk 14:19, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree w/ aeropagitica Olleicua 17:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. - Patman2648 00:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.