Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Woods Camp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
North Woods Camp[edit]
- North Woods Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I think that this article should be deleted as there is a lack of reliable sources independant of the summer camp itself or the camp's parent organisation, the YMCA of Greater Boston, which means that the article does not meet the Wikipedia:Reliable Sources or Wikipedia:Notability policies/guidelines.
The only sources provided in the article are two citations from the camp's website, and one cittion of the YMCA Greater Boston. Searching Google News for "North Woods" "Summer Camp" comes up with 171 results across all dates, but all of the ones I looked at used the term "North Woods" as a term for a geographical area, instead of the name of a specific summer camp. Filtering by adding "New Hampshire" failed to bring up any results specific to this camp, and using YMCA or Winnipesaukee (the lake the camp is on) as a qualifier provided only one relevant result,[1] a passing mention in an obituary for a man who worked as a chaplain at the camp at some point during his life. Similar searches of Google Scholar provided no relevant results I could find.
If multiple, reliable, independant sources can be provided, or the existence of such demonstrated, I would be willing to withdraw the nomination.
Declaration of Conflict: I worked at this camp as a foreign counselor a few years ago. The place is amazing, and I enjoyed my time there. However, I still believe that the camp does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines. -- saberwyn 07:05, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no reliable sources and lacks notability. Pyrrhus16 15:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not notable, no reliable sources. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.