Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closing duplicate nomination, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordica destinations (2nd nomination) for the actual AfD discussion. (non-admin closure) -- intgr [talk] 22:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nordica destinations[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is supported by only a single primary WP:SELFSOURCE. A {{third-party}} tag was removed. According to WP:PSTS, "Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability." The text could be merged into the main article. This standalone article fails WP:OR. I am sympathetic to the idea that the subject's website is likely to be accurate, but this article fails. A WP:BEFORE search for secondary sources turns up nothing useful. Rhadow (talk) 11:36, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The original discussion page was incorrectly formatted; I've fixed up the template and will relist it. I am neutral. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:41, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Original AfD was incorrectly formatted. Reslisting to get it back into the queue.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 21:42, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.