Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nordfjordeid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was nomination withdrawn, keep. Punkmorten 08:40, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nordfjordeid[edit]

Not worthy of its own article. Any information about Nordfjordeid, if it truly is significant, may and should be placed in the main article for Eid, Norway, as the information there is similarly sparse; I would rather expand the latter page into something more than keep two stubby ones. Nothing to merge from here, though. I move to delete. --Kinu 00:15, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've tweaked it a little. It's potentially keepable now, although a ~~mege~~ merge is still a possible option. Grutness...wha? 00:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge, depending on how much content we get. Night Gyr 01:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep geo-stub, if its deletable, then so is half of Wikipedia. Also I added some material to that which Grutness so kindly offered. Ruby 02:07, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Real place in Norway with real communities of interest. Additional to the information added by Grutness and Ruby, mathemetician Sophus Lie was born there in 1842. [1]. Capitalistroadster 02:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Real, unique community. Grandmasterka 02:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ruby. --Aaron 02:56, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this is a real place in Norway. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 04:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn (in other words, keep) per the additions made herein. Looks a lot better, and definitely distinguishes itself from the Eid, Norway article. Thanks, all! --Kinu 06:09, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as it is a real place. Carioca 07:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is verifiable and a geographic location. Dakota ~ ε 08:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.