Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norbert Redkie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against renomination. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:02, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Norbert Redkie[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Norbet Redkie is a successful businessman, but I don't know if much more can be learned from this article. The typical successful person in their industry must have some successes. There are some awards won by him, but I do not think that they are enough to prove that he should be in the encyclopedia. I wish him further successes, but there is still time before I'd invite him to Wikipedia. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nadzik: I appreciate the opinion and giving the intervention that kind of range, nevertheless I can't agree with your definition of a "typical successful person". When a given businessman runs ever-popular pubs throughout Warsaw and beyond, while at the same time producing feature films awarded at international film festivals, then in my criteria such activities are worth attention, and therefore I've adequately included them in a dedicated article. The man in question doesn't need "self-promotion" because he is a perfectly recognized individual, which has been consistently reflected in the number of quoted articles. — Kochas 23:18, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The best source I am seeing is a WP:INTERVIEW piece here [1], then there are some mentions in passing. I am not seeing how he meets WP:NBIO, but ping me if further sources are presented and argued to be in-depth and reliable. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG by having significant news coverage. Peter303x (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter303x, I am not questioning the amount of the coverage, just its quality. Nadzik (talk) 21:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.