Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonpoint source pollution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep, after the bold renaming. D e ath phoenix 04:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonpoint source pollution[edit]

Belongs in the Wikitionary. Bobby1011 04:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It does, but it also belongs here. It has a huge amount of information and could be vastly expanded. Here are some potential sources: [1] [2] [3] [4] - Also, over a million g-hits on an exact phrase search. 12000 hits on google-schoolar. ---J.Smith 05:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I like the idea of renaming it. Makes sense. Append my vote: +Rename ---J.Smith 19:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Volumes have been written about Nonpoint sources and Point sources with respect to environmental (typically water) pollution. These can be greatly expanded. bikeable (talk) 07:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename to Nonpoint source pollution. The phrase "nonpoint source" does not appear to be used in any other context. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 07:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Boldly renamed. GeorgeStepanek\^talk 19:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Bikeable. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 17:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Nonpoint source pollution, in agreement with GeorgeStepanek. Significant in context per J.Smith, but title without "pollution" would have only dicdef content. Barno 19:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (don't delete) this article and, as I don't know of anything but pollution to be in question, I also concur with renaming by appending the word pollution. -Onceler 03:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.