Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non è mai Passato

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The only keep opinions are by WP:SPA and possibly WP:COI accounts. Sandstein 06:19, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non è mai Passato[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence indicated or found that this meets notability guidelines for films or anything else. Low budget short film, yet to be released (reportedly due December 2017), so WP:CRYSTAL as well. Prodded but PROD removed by IP editor. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I agree with both of the original points. bojo | talk 13:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Some actors of the short film are present on the site "Malta Film Commission" and the short is on IMDb ; I am the creator of the page, if you want I'll add information/details --Bussival (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The page respect the requirements. — Giovaxim (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 10:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 19:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Bussival, IMDB contains a lot of a people/films/etc that do not meet wikipedia's notability requirements, and even an announced feature-length film with notable actors on IMDB does not have inherent notability (since films fail to progress all the time), per WP:NFF. What would be needed would be evidence of significant coverage sufficient to meet general or film-specific notability guidelines. That's difficult but not impossible for a short micro-budget film to meet, but would likely not be until the film is at least on the festival circuit and attracting significant independent critical attention and possibly awards. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 09:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unreleased films are typically not notable. I don't find anything to contradict that. IMDB is not a measure of notability.Glendoremus (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I inform you that there has been an budget increase thanks to external collaborations --Bussival (talk) 08:38, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.