Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nominations & Wons in the James Bond film series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of James Bond films#Critical reception and accolades. —Darkwind (talk) 20:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations & Wons in the James Bond film series[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from the rather painful article title and gaping lack of sources, the content of this page is merely a replication of List of James Bond films#Critical reception and accolades. - SchroCat (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 8. Snotbot t • c » 17:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The title has subsequently been altered from Nominations & Wons in the James Bond film series to List of accolades received by the James Bond film series. Although less painful, the title is now mismatched to the article, as it is "accolades received" is not correct. The central issue—that of the article being a repetition of a section of a Featured List—still remains. - SchroCat (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the Academy Awards and the BAFTA awards are industry awards not critic awards, the section, "critical reception", is not accurately named. I recommend the section in List of James Bond films be changed to "Accolades" or something along those lines. I have no problem with deletion of this article but if someone were to try to save this, it is now under a more appropriate name and one used by other similar lists of awards by film. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Critical reception" probably isn't the most appropriate name, but I think it's called that simply because the section has evolved from a critical reception section. However, I don't think it's the place of an AfD to rename sections in articles that are not even nominated. It would be better to start a discussion at that particular article. Betty Logan (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant section has now been renamed "Critical reception and accolades". - SchroCat (talk) 07:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wons? Me fail English? Unpossible! Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is redundant to List of james bond films#Critical reception, which covers awards and nominations. Betty Logan (talk) 07:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wons? Thank you for the very good laugh. This new article is redundant. - Fantr (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete -- Per everyone else. -- Cassianto ^Talk 17:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of James Bond films#Critical reception and accolades since we have a valid article title now. (Plus, redirects are cheap.) I assume we are okay with the accolades fitting into just a section, but is it not at all possible that there could be a valid stand-alone list of the accolades down the road? Erik (talk | contribs) 19:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Erik. Somewhere down the road, there could be a valid stand-alone list of the accolades for these films, but that would have to be after more such accolades are received. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:59, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.