Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nomikos Michael Vaporis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 01:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomikos Michael Vaporis[edit]

Nomikos Michael Vaporis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a particularly notable academic. JDDJS (talk) 18:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdwtalk 17:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Only a few GS cites in a very low cited field but passes WP:Prof#C8. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Keep although not as confident compared to others, the founding of a journal in 1984 at a notable university is enough. SwisterTwister talk 22:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- As holder of a senior post in what was probably a small college and editor of two journals. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Does seem to be notable. The article creator, User:Cvaporis, should be welcomed, helped, and pointed to WP:COI so that they understand those policies and take care with their editing! Smmurphy(Talk) 14:45, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.