Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokuthula Victoria makhubu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Will salt due to repeated recreation shown by Cryptic Eddie891 Talk Work 01:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nokuthula Victoria makhubu[edit]

Nokuthula Victoria makhubu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty clear autobiography - Cannot find any reliable, non-WP:SPS sources online. AviationFreak💬 17:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AviationFreak💬 17:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. AviationFreak💬 17:55, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete vanity article - not a notable model based on the fact that there is no WP:V Wm335td (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable and self-promotional article. Fails WP:NBIO ~ Amkgp 💬 18:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the opening line is horrendously non-encyclopedic. It is almost certainly an autobiography, which we need to proactively rid Wikipedia of.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:53, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Already speedied many times elsewhere and salted at at least Thula victorious and Nokuthula Victoria that I remember. No previous afds I'm aware of. I'll be blacklisting once this concludes. —Cryptic 23:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, I've blacklisted this now, since this person's been creating socks since at least April. No opinion whether we should let this run for form's sake. —Cryptic 00:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.