Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia Lumia 928
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. The nominator (PBASH607 (talk · contribs)) has withdrawn their nomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 18:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nokia Lumia 928[edit]
- Nokia Lumia 928 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Depends entirely on non-third party refernces, see WP:42. Add more reliable third party references or the page will be deleted. PBASH607 (The One Day Apocalypse) (talk) 17:02, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. czar · · 17:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The creator is putting a huge effort in adding third party links, and expanding the article by a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBASH607 (talk • contribs) 17:23, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: (edit conflict) None of the given sources are non-third party. All of the given sources are what I consider to be reliable. The Times of India, The Inquirer, Engadget, The Guardian and ReadWrite are all — or at least most of them are — reliable sources. I'm not sure you know what third-party or reliable sources; please read WP:TERTIARY and WP:RS carefully. smtchahal(talk) 17:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.