Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 500s

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete & redirect. — Scientizzle 16:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 500s[edit]

I find the article most unencyclopedic. Someone with a bit more interest on the subject, please rewrite it. It's falsely named and worthless as it stands; there are better articles such as List of Nokia products. I ended up in here by searching Nokia 500, the navigator phone which isn't listed in Wikipedia at all. Sigmundur (talk) 00:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Merge to List of Nokia products Travellingcari (talk) 17:29, 6 February 2008 (UTC) I get confused when to use "merge" and when to use "redirect", clearly I meant "redirect" in this case. Travellingcari (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Nokia products. The article is a breezy bit of opinion and original research, and there is nothing in it remotely worth merging. Edison (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Based mostly on obvious opinion ("very nice sound for its music player") and use of the phrase "as the T-mobile shop attendent said" [sic]. And if (as I agree) there's nothing worth merging, why merge? Just kill. Duncan1800 (talk) 08:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above. --Pwnage8 (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete On List of Nokia products 500s is listed under "other products" instead of "mobile phones", so this article was likely misnamed for a phone with a similar name (but all we know about which one that might have been is what the article tells us about it.. so not much). Nokia 500 as Sigmundur pointed out is again another phone which is not even mentioned on List of Nokia products. So I can see no point for even a redirect. --Minimaki (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment you may be right. According to Google this is a nokia 500s and while I don't know exactly what it is, it doesn't appear to be a mobile phone. Travellingcari (talk) 15:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Not even a mobile phone, and does not appear to be a notable product (whatever it is). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 22:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.