Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noida Sector 52 (Delhi Metro)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noida Sector 52 (Delhi Metro)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:crystal KDS4444 (talk) 12:50, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's under construction, so it will open. It's not just a plan. And we consider all railway/metro stations to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The nom's one-word WP:JUSTAPOLICY contradicts actual evidence that the line and station are under construction. [1] It took me less than 5 seconds to find that article. It doesn't seem WP:BEFORE was followed here. --Oakshade (talk) 06:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A ll Metro stations have always been consideredd notable here. We have often deleted ones merely in the planning stage , or the basis of WP:CRYSTAL, but this one is alraady under construction. DGG ( talk ) 22:10, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.