Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Shaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Shaw[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed and CSD'd - removed by creator. Very minor claims to notability but unsourced (a list of the subject's publications does not assert notability). Further research fails to locate sources that satisfy WP:ANYBIO. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only indication of notability I see here is the claim that he has artworks in "public collections", but this is too vague to be helpful. And the total lack of independent sources is also a big problem: even if there were an assertion of notability, we need something to use as the basis for writing an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Trove shows he was an illustrator for some books (Wikipedia makes it seem like he was the author) but that's it. eg.[1] -- GreenC 05:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't seem notable...Modernist (talk) 11:59, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.