Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noel Quiñones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noel Quiñones[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mr. Quinones does not meet the notability criteria as outlined in WP:FILMMAKER. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BASIC: [1] (El Nuevo Día), [2] (also in El Nuevo Día), [3], (bio in Puerto Rican biographical dictionary), and [4]. Additionally, his Flight of Fancy screened at Cannes in 2000. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 16:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Joe (talk) 17:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I too would had nominated it for deletion based on the sources listed in the when nominated. However, the 4 cites provided by AleatoryPonderings above tip the balance in favor of a Keep. What this article needs is to have AleatoryPonderings's cites incorporated into it. The cites are important as they are from three (3) independent secondary sources which consist of articles covering the subject of the article directly (as opposed to "in passing" only) and abundantly (as opposed to cursory). The article needs to be copy-edited a bit to show these 3 new cites as well as to highlight Quiñones's "Flight of Fancy" film, which itself has its own WP article. Mercy11 (talk) 01:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources presented by AP, establishes notability. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.