Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctambulous
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Noctambulous[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Noctambulous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM. No awards, no national distribution, few reliable sources with reviews or coverage. Rogermx (talk) 20:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - The article is sourced only to its own official site. Based on the talk page, the article was written by the movie's creator. A search for coverage in reliable sources literally turns up nothing. Fails notability in spades. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I found one review. That's it. One. The reviewer liked the movie, but a single review is not nearly enough for WP:NFILM. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 21:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I've searched quite thoroughly and I can't find anything that would cause this to pass WP:NFILM. It does sound like an interesting film, but I don't think that this is close to meeting any relevant notability guideline.--SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 01:26, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.