Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noal, Princess of the Sa'id

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ansh 666 04:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noal, Princess of the Sa'id[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability other than marriage. WP:INVALIDBIO "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B, such as being a spouse or child, is not a reason for a standalone article on A (unless significant coverage can be found on A)"

No coverage beyond that of her wedding to Muhammad Ali, Prince of the Sa'id Heliotom (talk) 09:29, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, there are 2 refs in the article which in my mind satisfy GNG, they are about her wedding as mentioned by the nom but I googled and also found mention of her giving birth. Szzuk (talk) 19:10, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

‘’’COMMENT’’’ getting married and giving birth is not notable. People do those all the time.Heliotom (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Week Keep added few more sources that's seems to suggest subject barely passes GNG.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additions but everything is solely in regard to the fact she got married. I don't see how it passes GNG at all. Again WP:INVALIDBIO. People get married all the time. Heliotom (talk) 11:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fake nobility, Afghanistan is no longer a monarchy. Coverage is superficial and tabloid-y. Sandstein 09:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have to invoke WP:OTHERSTUFF here; we have articles on a lot of European pretenders with lesser claims (for example, Carl, Prince of Wied). I also regularly vote delete on those when presented at AfD. The article certainly needs to be renamed if kept, I abstain from a !vote on keep/delete. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:13, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.