Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Vacancy (OneRepublic song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:15, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No Vacancy (OneRepublic song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a song released today. The only sources I could find were mentions in a couple of blogs. Fails WP:NSONG. - Mr X 18:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - new single by a very notable band. Jdcomix (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is NOTINHERITED. - Mr X 18:28, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 19:55, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed to Keep: Per new sources. SL93 (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Dedicated articles from high level, mainstream, reliable sources, like Billboard and People Magazine. Sergecross73 msg me 20:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sergecross73's sources. Pburka (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Mainstream sources used. More coverage will be coming soon since the song was just released. TheSubmarine (talk) 00:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep single from a notable band. A few reliable sources mentioned the song after the proposal was placed. More sources will obviously come. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect for now. But I reserve the right to change my vote to Delete in a week or two if needed. Yes, this page was created WP:TOOSOON and did not meet criteria at the time of creation. But we all know that once the media machines start their propaganda campaigns, I have no doubts that this song will pass. Kellymoat (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I won't press you much on this, since there's clearly no consensus for either of the stances you mention, but really? Do you really consider a Billboard article a propaganda campaign? Sergecross73 msg me 22:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - already has coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, per Sergecross73's research. Rlendog (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sergecross73's research. --Guy Macon (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above comments. It already has coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, as already show by Sergecross73's research. The "media machines" and "propaganda campaigns" claims are not appropriate for this discussion; please stick to Wikipedia policy in future AfD discussions and not your personal opinions; otherwise, I would simply suggest to avoid AfD discussions altogether if you do not want to constructively contribute to these types of discussions (especially as I have noticed issues with your contributions to AfD multiple times in the past). Aoba47 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.