Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Reasons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No Reasons[edit]

No Reasons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage by any means, it's claim of the first zero budget horror film is not supported by any reliable source, does not meet any criteria laid out at WP:NFO BOVINEBOY2008 13:39, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nothing popped out on my search other than this [[1]]. Kolma8 (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I improved the article some, but I couldn't find enough to justify it passing NFILM. If there were more coverage or some reviews then that would help, but this doesn't seem to have gained that. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 04:18, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 15:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.