Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Country for Old Musicians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:44, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No Country for Old Musicians[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have provided a source showing that it was released by legitimate Indie Label Pure Noise Records. Just because an album does not chart or earn awards does not mean it should be deleted. There is tons of helpful articles from smaller labels and bands on Wikipedia that does not chart. It was also funded via Kickstarter. Not many bands have been succesful in funding their albums via Kickstarter that have a history like Reggie and the Full Effect does. http://purenoise.net/news/pure-noise-partners-with-reggie-and-the-full-effect-to-release-new-album-no-country-for-old-musicians — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.58.81.126 (talk • contribs)

The standards we're measuring against are WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. The independent reviews found at AllMusic, Under the Gun and Pittsburgh Music Mag indicate that WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS are met, but it would be nice if there were more. — sparklism ^hey! 14:27, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one here, though I'm not sure how many of these are reliable. — sparklism ^hey! 14:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are multiple reliable secondary sources, and also articles about their tour for the album. A little of research and expansion and the article can be up to standards for album coverage. SarahStierch (talk) 00:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.