Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noël Saint-Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 16:48, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noël Saint-Thomas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested CSD. BLP article of an author which does not pass WP:NAUTHOR. Writer is one of many for the Teach Yourself series, does not appear to have any other notability to meet WP:GNG, all hits seem to be bookseller/reviewer sites. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 23:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 00:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --Cameron11598 ^(Talk) 00:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only one source is in the article currently, a link to a page where a book is for sale that credits this person as an author. I could not find any significant coverage of this person in reliable sources. Notability has not been established. Drchriswilliams (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources found. Nothing beyond writing anon-notable teaching book, an honorable thing to do, just not notable.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable. Note that the one source refers to her as a woman, while the article is written believing him to be a man. PamD 07:44, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The only thing we have listed as a reference (a link to Amazon) is completely inadequate, and I can't find anything better. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.