Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep; the nomination is disruptive and the book undisputedly notable-even free newspapers in the UK are reviewing it. Sceptre ^(talk) 10:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America[edit]

I decided this book fails Homotlfqa83 (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - "deciding the book fails" is not a criteria for deletion. The article has many outside references in a conducted engine search, meets notability guidelines, plus, no reason presented by nom for deletion.--S_RX 22:27, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets notability requirements. Dance With The Devil (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Easily meets notability requirements. Possibly disruptive nomination. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Chirps•Clams•Chowder)} 23:31, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Query why do you think that this AFD is possibly disruptive? Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Posts like this make me question the nominator's motivations. JuJube (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable book. ~~won awards~~ Won an award, which isn't too notable. Received major coverage. Reviews in NYT review of books, etc. Protonk (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That article could do better to illustrate the notability of the subject, so I can see where the nomination might come from. I don't feel it is a disruptive nom. Protonk (talk) 23:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I decided you fail. Keep JuJube (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Note that AfD nominator is also the article's creator. A completely bad faith nom. If I wasn't assuming good faith, I would think that User:JeanLatore (AKA banned user User:Wiki brah) had returned.... Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.