Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitro and Dykstra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nitro and Dykstra[edit]

My reason for nomination is that the team isn't notable enough as of yet. Teams like that come and go, so an article for the team shouldn't be created yet. Jลмєs Mลxx™ Msg me 03:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable yet, they've only teamed a couple of times. The page name isn't even right, they are not "Nitro and Dykstra" (they are go by their full names). TJ Spyke 03:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per TJ Spyke - Shudda ^talk 05:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now per above. Knowing pro wrestling though, they'll be around more. Whs itc hy 06:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and dump the corpse over Kenny's shoulder. Totally makeshift tag team at the moment; see Cena and Michaels. MarcK 06:23, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do not think this page should be deleted. I see why you think they may be a make shift tag team but WWE has made them an entrance video and tunnel video graphics, so surely they do not think they are only make shift. Why would they waste time doing this if they was only going to be around for the short term? Secondly, where is your source that they go by the full names? Jim Ross this week, labelled them as Nitro and Dykstra.
Keep Signs indicate they are going to be a regular fixure on the Raw roster, and if it's name problem you have I will fix the redirects — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingMorpheus (talk • contribs)
- They may be notable in the future, but they aren't yet. Also, I was just pointing out the name problem. It had nothing to do with my opinion on deleting it. There is nothing stopping this article from being recreated if the team does become notable. TJ Spyke 20:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Currently lacks notability, but maybe recreate in the future. *Cremepuff 222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no reason for an article on this short-lived team. Any valid information can go in the subject's respective articles (emphasis on the word valid). Suggestions that this team are likely to be a long-term regular unit are not legitimate reasons for inclusion (see WP:CRYSTAL). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 18:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Not notable. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 18:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Nikki311 20:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This team is not yet notable as per WP:N. There may be "signs" that they may be notable in the future, but there have been lots of teams that had signs of being notable who never became such. If the team becomes notable at a later date then the article can be recreated. My advice for the person(s) interested in having it is to work on it on your personal pages (sourcing it properly), and then if they become notable, transfer it to the proper page. - T-75|talk|contribs 22:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Someone has been regularly removing delete votes. Closing admin please check through page history. I've restored some, but not all as don't have time to troll through all the votes. - Shudda ^talk 01:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've just restored another deleted opinion (by MarcK, 06:23, 3 June 2007) above. Deor 02:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, This team has done nothing notable yet, perhaps in the future if they become an established team, but they're nothing of the sort yet. Bmg916^Speak_Sign 19:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No more of this "Two random people teamed up with no backstory, so we should make an article of them". Cena and Michaels was deleted, so this should go too. BBoy

Excellent point, considering Cena and Michaels are far more notable individually than the article subjects and their team were tag champs. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per the point which has been made above. The WWE Champion and one of the biggest Superstars of the WWE ever team up, they win the Tag Titles, and they don't get a page - what makes people think that this lot will be any different.... --SteelersFan UK06 01:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.