Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nishanth (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 12:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nishanth (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, The actor has played some supporting roles but I can't see if he has played any major role in any film except Thoonga Nagaram which was released in 2011 and I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources for a stand-alone article at least not yet. GSS (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak Keep~~~~. I think it passes WP:GNG~~...Rameshnta909 (talk) 08:54, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rameshnta909: I tried everywhere even accroding to WP:INDAFD but can't find a single independent reliable source to support WP:GNG which addresses the topic directly. GSS (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

He worked in 6 films and the part in one of them was notable. Anyway I am on the fence on this one...Rameshnta909 (talk) 11:27, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rameshnta909: And that fails to satisfy WP:NACTOR and its WP:TOOSOON for stand alone article. GSS (talk) 11:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

K Let's wait for a third opinion...Rameshnta909 (talk) 11:43, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is quite simple, trivial and unconvincing career, and nothing amounting to substance hence delete. SwisterTwister talk 00:30, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
For a consensus I change my position to Delete...Rameshnta909 (talk) 08:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.