Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nina Ivanišin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sam Walton (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nina Ivanišin[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NACTRESS. Lack of third party coverage. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:21, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She's got a lot of news coverage, but we should try to find someone who speaks Slovenian to help add the refs to the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:27, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. or modify to add references. It currently lacks any news references. Peter303x (talk) 20:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She's got a long article in Cosmopolitan with photos. https://www.cosmopolitan.si/zvezde/klemen-janezic-usodno-vino-se-je-porocil-poglej-kako-lepa-je-njegova-nevesta/. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
BeenAroundAWhile, and how is that significant coverage?

And the subject of the article is her husband Klemen Janežič not her.

This is a fluff piece at best. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 17:28, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I found more coverage, for example an extensive interview in Slovenia's leading newspaper, [1]. The article is subpar but the notability is there. She was the lead in several notable Slovenian films and won festival awards as well. --Tone 14:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Tone, hmm. Most interview articles aren't strong proof of notability.

However, WP:NACTRESS says "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" but on the article, it says she's only in 1 major film. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This interview is, it's from Sobotna priloga, the weekly feature of newspaper that contains high-quality articles and interviews. I added some awards and films, Idyll, where she was lead actress, won best film at Slovenian Film Festival. That makes it at least 4 relevant movies. That should cover the notability requirements. --Tone 17:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as sources exist. Just because they're in Slovenian doesn't mean they don't count. Bondegezou (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Bondegezou, prove. You can't say source exist without proof. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Multiple links are given above. A Google News search shows plenty more. I and others have added yet more to the article. Bondegezou (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's likely she would meet WP:NACTRESS for the lead roles in Slovenian Girl and sl:Idila (film), and she meets WP:BASIC with in-depth coverage in Delo (newspaper) [2], a paragraph in Jutarnji list [3] and a bit in 24ur.com [4] (not counting the WP:PRIMARY interview parts). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.