Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimisha Mehta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nimisha Mehta[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Not notable actor, has worked in only one unremarkable film. Most of the information is promotional. Coderzombie (talk) 16:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is created by the user who is banned for promotional content and has clear WP:COI with the subject of the article. Coderzombie (talk) 18:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has starred in two films that have reliable source coverage Days of Tafre, and There will be tomorrow [1] [2] as well as two seasons of a TV series. Passes WP:GNG with [[3]], [4] have access to Highbeam and this is sigcov, also [5], [6]. The article is no longer too promotional in its current state as it has been reedited by the nominator and myself. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The film she has worked in are not very notable. The TV series is also just a web series, not very notable, which is not enough for WP:NACTOR. Also, are two sources enough for WP:GNG? Coderzombie (talk) 08:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to be enough to pass WP:GNG and as per Atlantic Spiderone 21:23, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a WP:PROMO article on an unremarkable subject. Roles are not significant enough to pass notability guidelines for creative professionals. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.