Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimble Quest (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Dea db eef 21:54, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nimble Quest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, inadequate referencing. References weren't improved and are still not independent nor reliable. The previous discussion called for material to be added, which wasn't, thus the article stands as a mere stub with no notability besides number of downloads, which is not a notability claim per se. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator You are right, it was too hasty. Please close this nomination. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per the sources found in the last nomination, which was closed barely 2 weeks ago. Its far too soon for this to be renominated, not to mention, there are sources out there, and AFD is not cleanup. Either clean it up, or let it be. Sergecross73 msg me 14:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If you want to restart an AFD that closed just two weeks ago, you're going to have to bring some indisputably rock-solid reasoning for it. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The last AFD (which I created) was clear in that sources are not the problem and this meets WP:GNG. That the author(s) have been lazy in actually adding them to the article is another thing. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:08, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.