Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nilton Terroso

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus at this time is for the article to be retained. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:45, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nilton Terroso[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a football manager who fails WP:GNG and who has not managed a club in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without meaningfully addressing the concern. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strong Keep A search on portuguese football newspapers (A Bola, Record, O Jogo) yields several results (like [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]) which make him easily pass our notability guidelines. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 10:25, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment many of those articles may only be routine coverage of him (like the articles announcing him as a new manager). SportingFlyer talk 10:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 08:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - now passes GNG. Giant Snowman 19:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments I am going out on a limb here, but I think he can easily pass WP:GNG if the article was cleaned up. I've just read through 10 different articles on him regarding his management career, but what is confusing is some of them say he a former professional footballer who played in Portugal, I can't find any evidence online but is it possible he could also pass WP:NFOOTBALL? Govvy (talk) 10:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's here. I believe being a former Cardiff City manager makes him pass WP:NFOOTBALL. ( See also [9] in the South Wales Echo) Regards, Comte0 (talk) 17:01, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Being manager at Cardiff City would be sufficient for WP:NFOOTBALL, but he wasn't manager there. He was manager of Cardiff's under-21 team. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also he may have been professional, but it doesn't appear he played in any fully pro leagues. SportingFlyer talk 04:03, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I am more than happy with the article now that Quite A Character has helped clean it up, I will easily say the article now passes WP:GNG. Govvy (talk) 22:26, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given split views and an amended article
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Extensive media coverage on his Cardiff City spell (in both Portuguese and English language), but don't know if that's enough to grant article. However, surely his work in the LigaPro (Portuguese second division, professional level) does? --Quite A Character (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG through fails WP:NFOOTBALL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:44, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article about football manager which satisfies the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.